![]() ![]() The End of the World Means the End of Sex.Vote for your favorite Platinum Post February 28, 2023 Kya Meri Sonam Gupta Bewafa Hai Helmet 200 Halla Ho 14 Phere Dial 100 Popular LIVE TV Channels.Did Mark Write Mark? What the Apostolic Fathers Say March 1, 2023.Who Wrote the Gospels? Our Earliest (Apparent) Reference March 2, 2023.Is the Gospel of Mark in Papias Our Gospel of Mark? March 4, 2023.The Voice at Jesus’ Baptism–An Intriguing Version in the Gospel of the Ebionites March 5, 2023.March Gold Q&A: Submit your questions! March 6, 2023.Guest Post Announcing Publication, by Gary McCarragher March 7, 2023 And every dime goes to charities fighting poverty!! If you don’t belong yet, JOIN!!! You get SO much information for SO little money. The Rest of this Post is for Members Only. This included most everything it says about the historical Jesus, Mary Magdalene, the New Testament, and yes, the Arian Controversy and the Council of Nicea.Īmong other things – just to dispel one myth that so many people buy into – the Council of Nicea (which was called by the emperor Constantine in the year 325 CE) did not, decidedly did NOT, decide… Still, the problem I had with it was that so much information was wrong, even when getting it *right* would not have had any effect on the plot or the characters. But it’s a good blow-off novel if you don’t want a lot of substance. My sense is that people who don’t like it (i.e., most of my friends) are simply expecting way too much of it as a work of fiction. I myself did not dislike it so much: I thought for a page-turner at the beach, it was rather fun. There were tons of books written in response to Dan Brown’s novel, but virtually all of them were by highly religious (and angry) people – either Roman Catholic or conservative evangelicals – who had deep-seated theological reasons for really disliking the book. That’s why I wrote my earlier book Truth and Fiction in the Da Vinci Code. The Da Vinci Code is wrong about just about everything it says about the Arian Controversy, the emperor Constantine, and the Council of Nicea. I tell my students at Chapel Hill that if they want to learn about the history of the Middle Ages, the way to do that is not by watching “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.” And if they want to learn about the history of early Christianity, the way to do that is not by reading The Da Vinci Code. I’m afraid many people today (most?) get their knowledge of Arius, the Arian Controversy, and the Council of Nicea from that inestimable authority, Dan Brown, who wrote about it at length in that great work of historical realism, The Da Vinci Code. I chose to start at the *end* of the development (it’s actually nowhere near the end – since Christological arguments continued on for centuries – but it was one sensible ending points), with the controversies over Christ’s divinity in the early fourth century, controversies between Arius and his detractors. (!) But I chose to do it differently from how I do it in the book, at least in terms of rhetorical strategy. In my main lecture during the debate this past weekend, I decided to develop in short order the case that I make in my book How Jesus Became God for how, well, Jesus became God. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |